Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) taproots are often infected with soilborne pathogens included Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, Aphanomyces,
Pythium and Geotrichum. These evidenced to cause substantial
qualitative and quantitative losses [1]. Till today, 13 anastomosis
groups (AG1-AG13) of R. solani have been reported in a wide range of
crops, among them AG 2-2 mainly cause root and crown rot in sugar
beet [2]. In August/2019-sugar-beet growing season, dark brown to
black irregular water-soaked lesions were observed on the sugar beet
taproot in the production areas of Foxhome (46.2774° N, 96.3100° W),
Minnesota. Approximately 2-5% of disease incidence was recorded.
Small pieces (10 mm²) of symptomatic root tissues ... More
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) taproots are often infected with soilborne pathogens included Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, Aphanomyces,
Pythium and Geotrichum. These evidenced to cause substantial
qualitative and quantitative losses [1]. Till today, 13 anastomosis
groups (AG1-AG13) of R. solani have been reported in a wide range of
crops, among them AG 2-2 mainly cause root and crown rot in sugar
beet [2]. In August/2019-sugar-beet growing season, dark brown to
black irregular water-soaked lesions were observed on the sugar beet
taproot in the production areas of Foxhome (46.2774° N, 96.3100° W),
Minnesota. Approximately 2-5% of disease incidence was recorded.
Small pieces (10 mm²) of symptomatic root tissues were cut from
the margins between infected and healthy tissue, and disinfected
with 10% sodium hypochlorite for 1 min, rinsed three times with
autoclaved water, and then placed on potato dextrose agar (50% PDA)
for incubation at 35°C in the dark for 2 days. Subsequently, single
hyphal tips were transferred to potato dextrose ager (PDA). In total, 8
isolates were developed from diseased beet collected from Foxhome.
Macroscopically, isolates were developed light brown fungal biomass
on PDA in 14 days. Microscopically, hyphae branch at a 90° angle,
and septa near the branches and slight constrictions at the bases of
the branches were present [3]. Based on macroscopic and microscopic
characteristics, the fungus was speculated to be Rhizoctonia solani.
Determining the subgroups, genomic DNAs of 8-isolates were used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using ITS-1 and ITS-2 primers
[4,5]. PCR amplicons were cleaned with E.Z.N.A ®Cycle Pure Kit,
OMEGA, and 8 samples were sent for Sanger sequencing to GenScript
(Piscataway, NJ). The sequences were identical, and Blast analysis
showed 100% sequence homology to R. solani AG4HG-II (Genbank
accessions: MN106353.1). The nucleotide sequence was deposited
in Genbank (MT108198.1). Pathogenicity assay was performed with
3-week old sugar beet susceptible cultivar which was inoculated with
a 2-week old culture -mycelial plug (5 mm²) was placed at a 1/2-inch
depth. The study was done twice with four replicates and 10 plants
per replicate. Six weeks of post-inoculation, all inoculated plants
developed similar symptoms of taproot rot as discussed above, whereas
mock-inoculated plants were healthy. Pathogen re-isolated from
the infected root tissue and was further confirmed morphologically
and molecularly, fulfilled Koch’s postulates. AG4 HG-II previously
reported to cause disease on sugar beet in Idaho [6]. To our best
knowledge, this is the first report of R. solani AG4 HG-II on sugar
beet in Minnesota, USA.